Amendment XXV, Section 4 · Ratified February 10, 1967
The Constitution already has a remedy for a President who cannot discharge the duties of the office.
It is not impeachment. It requires no crime. It asks only one question — is the President able? — and it places that question in the hands of the Vice President and the Cabinet. The record below is what they have chosen not to answer.
I. The Remedy
What Section 4 actually does — and what it doesn't.
The 25th Amendment is often confused with impeachment. They are different instruments for different problems. Impeachment punishes misconduct: it begins in the House, requires “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” and permanently removes an officer. Section 4 addresses inability: it begins inside the executive branch, requires no wrongdoing at all, and is reversible the moment the inability ends.
The mechanism was written to be fast and to be checked at every step. The Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet transmit a written declaration to the Speaker and the President pro tempore. The Vice President becomes Acting President immediately. If the President objects, the Vice President and Cabinet have four days to re-declare; Congress must then assemble within forty-eight hours and decide within twenty-one days. Only a two-thirds vote of both chambers keeps the Vice President in place. Otherwise the President resumes his powers.
In other words: Section 4 cannot be used as a coup. It is the most heavily supermajority-protected process in the Constitution. What it can do is force the question into the open — under oath, on the record, with the country watching — instead of leaving it to be litigated by press-secretary adjectives.
When Vice President Pence declined to invoke it in January 2021, he wrote that the amendment “is not a means of punishment or usurpation.” That is exactly right — and it is exactly why it is the appropriate instrument now. Pence letter, Jan. 12, 2021
- 1Declaration. The Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet transmit a written declaration of inability to the Speaker and the President pro tempore.
- 2Immediately. The Vice President assumes the powers and duties as Acting President.
- 34 days. If the President declares no inability exists, the Vice President and Cabinet have four days to re-declare.
- 448 hours. Congress assembles, if not already in session.
- 521 days · ⅔ of both Houses. Congress decides. Absent two-thirds in both chambers, the President resumes office.
II. The Standard
“Unable to discharge” was never a medical term. The Framers of the amendment said so.
The men who wrote the 25th Amendment in 1965 were asked, repeatedly, to define “inability.” They refused — deliberately. Senator Birch Bayh, its principal author, described the covered condition as “an impairment of the president's faculties, meaning that he is unable either to make or communicate his decisions as to his own competency to execute the powers and duties of his office.” The House floor manager, Rep. Richard Poff, said it reached a President suffering “mental debility” that leaves him unable to make rational decisions — not only one who is “unconscious or paralyzed.”
Bayh was equally clear about who decides. The drafters specifically rejected proposals to hand the determination to physicians. “The determination of Presidential disability,” he said, “is really a political question” — one for the officers who watch the President work every day. That is why the Cabinet, not a medical board, holds the pen.
And he was clear about why it mattered. At a moment, he told the Senate, “when it is possible actually to destroy civilization in a matter of minutes,” Congress must “make absolutely certain that there will be a President.” Sixty years later, a President who posts at dawn that “a whole civilization will die tonight” is not an abstraction the Framers failed to anticipate. It is the exact scenario they wrote the amendment for.
“An impairment of the president's faculties, meaning that he is unable either to make or communicate his decisions as to his own competency to execute the powers and duties of his office.”
“The determination of Presidential disability is really a political question.”
“We have indisputably entered the realm of profound medical difficulty and concern.”
III. The Record
The documented record, in order.
Each entry states what happened in neutral terms and links to its source. Where the White House has offered an explanation, it is quoted.
IV. Who Has Said It
This is no longer a fringe position.
Senators, dozens of House members, a governor, the President's own former White House lawyer, a former Republican congresswoman, and thirty-six physicians have said it publicly. The petition asks the twelve people with the constitutional power to act to join them.
V. The Objections — Answered Honestly
The strongest arguments against, and why they don't hold.
“His doctor says he's in excellent health and aced his cognitive test.”
True: the White House physician's memos of April 2025, December 2025 and May 2026 all report “excellent health” and a perfect Montreal Cognitive Assessment score. CBS News
But the MoCA is a ten-minute screen for dementia; it does not measure judgment, impulse control or fitness to command nuclear forces. And Section 4 was written precisely so the question would not rest on a doctor employed by the patient. The drafters rejected a medical board. They gave the decision to the Cabinet because they wanted the people in the room to answer for what they see in the room. The Secretary of State's sworn testimony that he has “never seen him fall asleep” — moments before being shown video of it — is a reminder of why that accountability matters.
“Section 4 is for a President in a coma, not one you disagree with.”
This is the most serious objection, and scholars such as Brian Kalt make it well: the drafters wanted an “unmanned helm,” not a tool against unpopular Presidents. Lawfare
We agree that policy disagreement is never grounds. The record above is not a list of policies. It is a physician-documented pattern of confusion about his own medical care, repeated inability to remain conscious at official events, a hospital-visit cadence his own doctor calls routine but no modern President has matched, and threats of civilizational annihilation issued and withdrawn within a single day. The floor manager of the amendment said in 1965 that “mental debility” rendering a President unable to make rational decisions is exactly what Section 4 covers. The question is not whether he is disagreeable. It is whether he is able.
“The Cabinet will never do it, so this is pointless.”
The Cabinet will not act without public pressure — that is why this site and the petition exist. In 1987, Reagan's incoming chief of staff Howard Baker quietly weighed Section 4 after staff described a disengaged President; he investigated, found otherwise, and dropped it. History.com That is the process working. What is happening now is the process being refused. There is also a second route: Section 4 lets Congress create “such other body” to make the determination. Rep. Raskin's H.R. 8275 would do exactly that with a bipartisan panel of physicians, psychiatrists and statespersons. Congress.gov
“Democrats ignored Biden's decline. This is partisan.”
The standard should be the same for every President, and many of the people quoted above said so about the last one. The test is not the party of the President; it is the evidence. That is why this page refuses to rely on tabloids or on anonymous claims, cites the White House's own rebuttals alongside the incidents, and links to Republican and formerly Republican voices — Sen. Murkowski, Rep. Massie, Rep. Kiley (independent since March 2026), Ms. Greene, Mr. Cobb — where they exist. If you believe the evidence is wrong, tell us which entry and why.
The Petition
Ask the twelve people who can act to answer one question.
The petition is addressed to the Vice President and the principal officers of the executive departments. It asks them to do what the Constitution empowers — and, we argue, obligates — them to do: make a determination, in writing, on the record.
Then tell people why, with #25thNow:
VI. Live
What people are saying with #25thNow.
Public posts tagged #25thNow, pulled directly from each network as you read. Unfiltered and unaffiliated — these are their words, not ours.
Loading posts…